swimmy

Personalness.

So, you know, I've been blogging. Just not here. Whyyyyyyy? Just not a lot to say about myself relative to other stuff. My life is good, blah blah blah.

What I can't talk about on that other blog, because of who knows about it, is my conversion to atheism. And it weighs on my mind pretty often. I want to write about it. I know, there are lots of books on the subject of God and science, but whenever I randomly pick one up, I always notice two things: 1) The author tends to be totally ignorant of the Bible and theology. Not a bad thing in general, but if you're trying to convince people, it helps to be as specific as possible. It was, ultimately, an argument straight from the Bible that turned me around. 2) The author has a non-Bayesian understanding of evidence for everything but religion. Understandable, as Bayesian probability theory has only been worked up properly in the last 50 years. But this is why so-called evidentialists get away with such tremendous bullshit. These people don't understand what evidence really is because, hey, neither do a whole lot of scientists.

So maybe I have an advantage? A little? Just a thought. I might use this journal to get some of that out.

Otherwise, uh. I'll try to fill in more random personal stuff? I don't know.
swimmy

MEMORIES!*

I just remembered something. I must have been about 5 years old, and I realized that numbers were not inherently associated with specific fingers. Instead of counting out 1 and raising my index finger, I could start on any finger I wanted. I tried to show this amazing scientific finding to my family by saying, "Hey, look: One." and raising only my middle finger. My brother burst out laughing. I was confused. Either he didn't understand my awesome finding, my finding was wrong, or a raised middle finger meant something I didn't understand. Just to make sure, I tried it again. "No, look! One!" Again with the laughter. I decided hypothesis three was correct and I shouldn't raise my middle finger alone, even though my brother wouldn't tell me why it was wrong.

Science!

*Reference, duh.
swimmy

Grumble brumgle!

Superbad just made me ache for Angus. I can't watch the intro without getting all goosebumpy. Why isn't this on DVD yet? Somebody fix this immediately.

As I've been passing around elsewhere: Medical reviews of House. The guy isn't a particularly good writer, but it's fun to know just how much the show is reaching. My favorite? When they gave one of the main characters an incurable condition.

Tim Harford on Colbert. This is amazing.

In conclusion, let me smell yo dick:
swimmy

Sometimes stuff.

Some of these are certainly performance posts or trolls, but not many of them. So that's. . . funny.

Oh, remember the Whitest Kids sketch about the tattoo? Well, hey!

So that guy's an idiot and a total badass.

(Edittttt or just good at photoshop, else "Happy birthday Rick" would be backwards, huh?)

If you've not been paying attention to everywhere else I post, Barkley, Shut up and Jam: Gaiden is the best game ever. It's a Charles Barkley RPG. THAT SHOULD BE ENOUGH.
swimmy

Part 10: My New Favorite Memory

Ten entries about the ten best songs of all time.

The Weakerthans - "This Is a Fire Door Never Leave Open"

I've been reading Tyler Cowen's Discover Your Inner Economist. In the fourth chapter, this pops up:
We use our cultural decisions to support or help create stories about what kind of person we are, what kind of marriage we want, or what kind of job we aspire to have. The most important of these narratives concern--can you guess?--ourselves. My personal story is that of a curious intellectual nerd polymath, loving husband and stepdad, and music lover and collector of Mexican Outsider Art, among other qualities. For better or worse, I've never much bothered with "pillar of the local community," "ardent political activist," or "suicide helpline operator." Sometimes I change or bend my narrative, but for the most part I invest in the stories I already have and extend them. Even when I pick up a new cause, I look for continuity with previous interests and commitments.

Does everyone else do this too?

The closest thing I've ever had to a crisis came when I lost my narrative. I was pacing back to my apartment on campus, mildly drunk, burned out and disappointed about the whole night, and I realized: "If this were two years ago, my stomach would be on fire."

Everyone knows the story, right? I spent most of my life with horrible ulcers. Anything that made me nervous made my stomach catch on fire. So did Thinking Unhappy Thoughts. I was in constant pain, an uncomfortable child and a wasting-away teenager. (I still get the same treatment, you know: "You only weigh what?" "You should wear clothes that don't make you look so skinny." "You eat food now, right?") I reached a pinnacle at which I could control my stomach as negative reinforcement, when I thought or did things I decided I didn't like. I wrote a huge Thing On The Internet about it all, ulcers as an overarching narrative for my life--maybe you read it? It was kind of juvenile but it was cute. Right?

By my own narrative, that night, I should have been doubled over in pain. I wasn't. This, my friends, is the most despairing thing I've ever experienced. The ulcers were long gone, leaving only a lingering after-effect on my personality. I had to build a new narrative and I didn't know where to start.

I'm at a point now where I do, having broken pretty much every promise I ever made to myself. And that's the problem. How do you deal with conflicting narratives? In high school, a classmate explained to a teacher the joy of pulling our senior prank: "It brought everyone together," he said, "from the jocks to the nerds to the stoners to the preppy kids to. . . whatever Tim is, I don't know, a computer guy or something." Maybe it was that I didn't hang out with anyone else he knew. But I chuckled. It was so fitting. So then:

How To Construct a Narrative or The Weakerthans Are Totally Awesome

Most of my friends know my mother's medical history by now. Some things are genetic that really shouldn't be, curse you biological mechanisms. Some days I think about calling her and asking how to fix it, but I always decide against it. Instead I sit and stew--I probably have too much confidence in my brain or my luck. Meanwhile, Bomb the Music Industry! lyrics repeat over and over--It's never gonna stop until we're dead. I know. We'll get there.

It's a stupid game. When I'm well-rested I can cope, when I'm tired I feel like driving my car off a bridge. I'm a nostalgic kid, but like my ulcers I can see that dying--I just don't care about WCA anymore, and I sure as hell can't express things well in livejournal anymore. So I take to rambling. Word association. It's kind of what I've always done, hence people thinking I was always on drugs. Look, you don't need drugs to be messed up in the head, some of us are like that to begin with.

I see things I know I didn't see. If I'm in the right mood I run with it, yes that man really was a lumbering vulture. What I don't see is people--or I do, as "in a mirror dimly," because--well, because that's how must of us construct others, as functions of ourselves. Our model of others is quite often our model of ourselves, which is why the symmetry thesis has some truth to it. This becomes more of a problem the more contradictory or complex your narrative is. You become completely unable to model other people properly. You get distressed. You get lonely. You connect with people only on superficial levels, only in ways you don't understand. You become convinced that interpersonal communication is a lie--especially once you realize a few simple truths.

The trick is to put all that away. If you were wrong in the past, you will continue to be wrong if you use the same model. Adjust your model, do your best to make that mirror a little more clear. This--yeah. It's not easy. Personally, I have to find something certain, something to never let go of, no matter how trivial, something unassailable and unquestionable.

The other problem is that I remember everything, no matter who you are. People don't expect you to be such a good listener because that's not how they model others--because they aren't themselves. I react to things I remember from months before; "Well I don't remember that." That off-the-cuff remark you didn't mean at all? I've taken it to heart. This isn't to say I'm sensitive--I am, yeah, but I mean that I think about what you've told me, whether it's hurtful or sweet or unintentional or witty or an interesting or dull observation. I remember your friends' names--you don't have to tell me who they are every time! If I say I don't remember something, I'm either being briefly absent-minded or I'm lying; it never ceases to amaze me how I can keep getting away with that. Frankly, I catch other people doing the same thing all the time. From here out, follow this guideline when dealing with me, it will force us both to be more honest: I did not forget.

The rest is daydream stuff, but I'm getting better at that. Thinking about more concrete things (he said as he stared out the window and watched the woman walking by). Economics, videogame theory. Last night I went to bed angry at people who try to justify the Great Leap Forward. (There's that tired thing again; I really lose all composure.)

I had a long talk with my dad on my last visit home. Most of the conversation was about signaling, how complicated but wasteful it was, how I've never been good at it, never been interested in dressing like a punk or doing drugs, never wanted to jump through hoops I didn't think I needed to, never wanted to playact to impress people. Now, uh. Well. It's mostly still true. Yeah--I'm still angry about this. When people tell you that society is "fucked up," this is what they mean, or should mean. That's a rant for another day. In fact. . . that's an academic career, if you're willing to be outspoken and scientific enough.

This is all part of an honest metanarrative. Awareness of signaling--where do I engage in it, where do I not, do I do any of it well? When I want to show dominance of one narrative over another, what do I do? Which narratives have thus far gotten the special treatment, and which ones have only gotten lip service? How do these signals flow in the channel of someone who's constantly and dangerously depressed, inquisitive, arrogant, thoughtful, tactless, awkward, wishy-washy, a good ol', all-around Bad Person?

And why bother making such a thing? A postmodernist might say, give up, live with contradicting narratives or with no narrative at all: The cat is not there. The short answer is that, as quietly and with as much patience as possible, I'm angry. It won't go away as long as my storyline is cluttered, as long as there's no way to explain why.

I told someone, once, after we took a trip to Waffle House at 3 in the morning to dance to Prince on the jukebox--ok, she was the only one who danced, I was too shy--that I would write about it some day, which she took as an amazing compliment. Well: here you go. I think it's my new favorite memory. If you read this, maybe that will mean something.
swimmy

Part 9: Song 2

Ten entries about the ten best songs of all time.

The Mountain Goats - "Going To Georgia"

Sometimes, things just are.

Philosophers argue the whys. How can we all know that we're really here, not just brains in a jar? A priori knowledge, presuppositionalism, foundationalism! How about that old standard, "I think, therefore I am?" I know I exist because my brain operates. Then we get into the matter of bias. Maybe you're only biased to know you exist! Or. . . something. At the very least, you're not sure. But we can say what a priori really means, right? If something is true simply by our thinking of it, we can prove it's true by examining someone else think of it--our very rational processes are evidence. (Thought is nothing more than a biological function anyway, right?) But on the other hand, maybe this is all a subset of value, something that's different westerners than other cultures. (Hi Hannah!) Is literature filling in the holes of life or is life filling in the holes of literature?

Some of these are deep thoughts and some of them aren't. Some of them I came up with when I was 10. Few of them particularly interest me anymore. I abandon it all to the philosophers, because 5,000 years of this existential angst is enough for me to decide there are more interesting questions. They can keep having that kind of fun if they want. (Hi John!)

I think most people have come to similar conclusions, right? Everyone's seen The Matrix, everyone's aware of the possibility that they're in a computer simulation, and nobody actually cares, right? Maybe there's some religious debate, here, but otherwise, we're doing dandy just living our lives. We are.

What strikes me, then, is widespread unwillingness to apply this principle elsewhere in life.

I can explain denial. I can tell you why it's appealing, at certain times--I can give you examples of times I've lied to myself. And I can explain embarrassment, Lord knows I can tell you times I've been embarrassed. But if I were to establish a grand narrative of my life, right now, I would tell you these things are phases: ordinary parts of humanity exaggerated to dominate my then-personality. I would tell you, now, that all those little lies I've tucked away in the corner of my mind--I've done my best to face them.

Like Yudkowsky, in that post, I can tell you when I began my journey as a rationalist. I won't, of course, not here. Like Yudkowsky, I had a revelation. I had knowingly lied to myself and forgotten about it. When I dredged up the memory, I knew it was time to change my belief. The truth is, we all know. We can all clean our minds of inconsistencies and falsehoods. We can all face the hard questions about our thought processes that have been nagging at us. It has to be done carefully, sure--no repeating standard arguments, no shying away for an easier variant of the question at hand. If the truth hurts, it should.

If the truth hurts, it should. There are no exceptions to this rule.

Now. The applications for this are not merely religious or philosophic. Everything you think and believe has a reason. If you are afraid of things you really think and believe, you are creating falsehoods in your mind. There is always a why to how you feel, but what's important is that you accept that you feel that way. If you want to change it, do so the right way: examine how you should feel, given the evidence. Use your intellectual curiosity, for crying out loud. You have it for a reason. And if you don't, I would argue, you are a bad person, or at the very least what's wrong with the world.

Lest you think this is a rationalist screed against your personal belief system, mind that I am talking about love. And sex. And human relationships. They're weird, aren't they? But there they are.